This may seem like a moot point in the wake of the horror that is the Benoit murder-suicide. I do not mean to minimize the tragedy by nit-picking. But I cannot believe that in this day and age I am seeing headlines like this one from Fox News:
WRESTLER CHRIS BENOIT, WIFE ARGUED OVER RETARDED CHILD BEFORE MURDER- SUICIDE
And here it is again.
And again.
Retarded child? Retarded? Are you kidding me? This poor child is the victim of a senseless murder and the media has the gall to refer to him in the most insulting, dehumanizing way possible? And this wording appears to be coming straight from the Associated Press.
If you are one of those people who says things like, "I'm so tired of having to watch every single word I say or some liberal is going to get all PC on me", then stop reading now. Move on. For everyone else, if you'd like a short refresher course on how to avoid sounding like these morons, keep reading after the jump.
First of all, the person comes before the disability. It is preferable to talk about a person with a disability as opposed to saying a disabled person, although that's usually OK too. Try not to use the disability as a noun to define an entire group of people, such as the blind or the paraplegic. Handicapped is a term used only to refer to things like parking, not to people. And even when discussing parking or curb cuts, it is still more appropriate to say accessible rather than handicapped. In general, avoid terms like afflicted with or suffering from. Replace the phrase birth defect in your vocabulary with the word congenital. But don't feel as if you need to change your everyday speech. People who use wheelchairs say they are going for a walk, blind people say they saw that article in the paper today, And deaf people say that they heard about your new job. They know they have a disability. They would prefer you don't dance around it. At the same time, I can't speak for everybody, so don't make any assumptions. Ask. Everyone is an individual with a right to self-reference.
During the first big wave of political correctness, some awkward language was developed. All of that "vertically-challenged" lingo never really caught on. There are still a few terms that are kind of wordy, such as the one used to replace retarded. Most people use the term developmentally delayed, which is often shortened to D.D. Some people prefer the term developmentally disabled, which is also handily shortened to D.D. Persons with Down Syndrome should never be referred to as Mongoloid. I don't care what DEVO said. Ironically, like the NAACP, organizations that are fighting this kind of stigma are the last ones to change their stationary, so there is still the Association for Retarded Citizens (ARC).
People who are developmentally delayed are those who have the disability as children. Some people survive a trauma later in life that affects their cognitive ability. They are not brain-damaged. They are people with traumatic brain injuries, or TBI for short.
People who have Cerebral Palsy, or CP, should not be referred to as spastic or spazzes, although that should be pretty obvious. Remember too, that CP does not affect a person's cognitive ability. People who have epilectic seizures are referred to as having a seizure disorder. They might have a seizure or an episode, but not an epileptic fit. I think most people know to say little people rather than dwarf or midget.
Many awkward terms like hearing-impaired never really caught on. Impaired is not exactly a flattering word either. In general, people who use sign language prefer to be called deaf, and people who speechread usually prefer to be referred to as hard-of-hearing. When in doubt, ask. The catchall phrase for this entire group is people who are deaf and hard-of-hearing. Just don't say deaf and dumb. Or deaf-mute. Most people who are deaf have the ability to speak; it is just really hard when you don't know what speech sounds like. There are also some people who do have a disability that causes them to be unable to speak, although they can hear. They are usually said to have a communication disability, or less commonly, a speech impairment. Similarly, visually-impaired, though used more often than hearing-impaired, is kind of awkward. Most people refer to themselves as blind, or if the loss of vision is not that severe, they have low-vision.
People who use wheelchairs are exactly that, people who use wheelchairs. Some people say they have limited mobility, are mobility-impaired, or a wheelchair-user. They are not confined to a wheelchair. They are not wheelchair-bound. People who have the inability to move from the waist down have paraplegia. People who are immobilized from the neck down have quadriplegia. Do not refer to them as quads. Some people have had amputations, but it is inappropriate to use the word amputee. Words like quad and amputee focus on the disabilty and dehumanize the person. People who use leg braces or other devices are often referred to in terms of limited mobility. Do not say crippled or gimp unless you want a crutch up your ass.
Lastly, when referring to people who do not have a disability, try to avoid saying normal. Deaf people call us hearing and blind people call us sighted. Most other people with disabilities refer to us as nondisabled. Some of the more radical groups call us TA's or temporarily-abled. They want to remind us that we are all just one car accident away from being disabled ourselves, so not to act so goddamned smug.
(Photo courtesy of www.hawking.org.uk It was taken at Caltech in 2000, where I had the great privilege of meeting him. Hawking has ALS, a neurological disease.)
Language is fluid, and ever-changing. This terminology is as up-to-date as I am. Feel free to jump in if you have anything to add, another personal preference, or information that differs from mine. I am including all of the terms I can think of at the moment, but I may have overlooked some of the communities that I don't interact with on a regular basis.
ADDENDUM:
From the 2007 AP Style Guide:
RETARDED: Mentally retarded is the preferred term for those with significantly subaverage intellectual functioning. Do not use"retard".
(Thanks, Anti)
And the going gets weirder:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070628/od_nm/italy_teacher_dc
(Thanks, Andy)




i just think words only have the power we give them. retarded means slower than normal development. why cant we just use the word for what it means?
I think that in language, brevity and conciseness is key, therefore I would have preferred the use of the abbreviated but instantly recognizable term 'tard.
Was the above photo modified with Adobe® Photoshop™ software? I thought Stephen Hawking was a person with blue eyes.
I thought 'dwarf' was appropriate - since the medical condition is called 'dwarfism'. I have heard the word 'Achondroplasia', but I think that's not the only disorder that causes dwarfism.
@ marc: in a perfect world, we could. but unfortunately language is nothing except the meanings we have given the words, and despite what the word originally meant, any typical english speaking person hearing the word "retarded" doesn't think "slowed down", they think "moron". i don't think the comments section is the right place to launch into an explanation of signifier vs signified, but hopefully you get what i'm saying.
@ fredcamino: funny, but out of place. i thought you types were told to move on after the first paragraph?
p.s. i meant to say, excellent article. i think it's also worth pointing out that there is a significant difference between physical and mental disabilities and as crude a term as it is, "retarded" generally refers to the latter. someone with cp, or als, like hawking, might not expect to fall into that generalization.
Bottom line is to be sensitive to others period. If people just put some thought before speaking there would not be issues like the one in the article.
Damn those 'tards from Fox!
I used the picture of Hawking, a person who does not have a developmental delay, but a physical disability, in my attempt to illustrate two things - first, some disabilities are so incapacitating that falsely assume people's cognition is affected when it is not. So don;t make assumptions about people's abilities. Secondly, compared to Hawking, most of us are pretty slow ...it's a matter of degrees.
I used a photo from Hawking's website, so I am not sure if it has been digitally enhanced. His eyes look bluish in the photo to me, and it is how I remember him looking when I met him.
According to the Little People of America Website, some organizations do use the word "dwarf", although they usually say "little person" or "person of short stature". I think some people's issue might be that "dwarf" labels the person by focusing on the disability. Maybe saying "a person with dwarfism" would be more acceptable. I do not happen to have any friends in that community, so I welcome comments.
Website for Little People of America:
http://www.lpaonline.org/mc/page.do?sitePageId=44394&orgId=lpa
"Remember too, that CP (cerebral palsy) does not affect a person's cognitive ability."
I have two comments to offer:
1) As best I understand it, CP is usually caused when a portion of a person's brain does not receive oxygen, causing the brain cells in that area to die. Specifically, it is the brain area that controls such functions as movement and speech.
However, this area -- I think -- is not that far from other areas that control other functions, such as the cognitive functions.
So it seems plausible that some persons who have CP might also have lost brain cells that control cognitive functions and therefore have varying degrees of cognitive impairment.
2) Many persons who have CP, have not received as much intellectual stimulation as they would have received if they did not have CP.
This can be because:
a) they may be put in a school with low expectations for the children such as some schools for the physically handicapped;
b) they are put in a mainstream school but in a "slow class" (i.e., tracking)
c) they are put in a regular class but the teacher treats him or her as "slow";
d) they learn less from family & friends because those people are less attracted to them (or repulsed);
e) they have less opportunity to learn from personal relationships (e.g., a boy having a girlfriend) because a girl without CP will not typically want a boyfriend with CP and a girl with CP may be unavailable or the boy with CP may not be attracted to her. People who are ugly but have no physical handicap have the same problem. Being unattractive oneself can put attractive people out of reach, but it doesn't make the unattractive person attracted to other unattractive people.
Self Disclosure: I have mild CP.
Very interesting. Thanks for the input. I did not take into account social factors. I have just noticed that people with CP are often treated as "slow", so I wanted to clarify that it is not the same as being developmentally disabled. I wonder what the incidence is of people with CP having a secondary disability caused by the same etiology
I like how when referring to people that offend you by saying “retarded”, you describe them as being morons. You may not realize but BOTH retarded AND moron were official classification of a level of IQ. As a commenter said: A word only has the power we give it. Your ignorance of outdated proper (it was at one time) usage does not make it an insult. If someone said “Wow that is a queer little house, I like it a lot” they are not somehow insulting it. Just because they did not use the term as the common slang term does not make it wrong. If someone says that guy is sick (referring to his health) are you foolish enough to only assume he is using slang and really meaning “cool”, “awesome”, etc…? Or the same with the slang “sweet”?
I assume a person writing an article will not be using slang (unless it is relevant) as their usage is expected to be of the professional type so if you look up the dictionary definition then you will see he was not being insulting in the least bit (only for those doing their best to find anything and everything offensive so they have something to “protest”/complain about).
I also think it is funny you are worried about you being PC when you are doing just the opposite. You stated: “Handicapped is a term used only to refer to things like parking, not to people.”, how can a parking space be handicapped? Once again you are mistaken as Handicapped means: “having a physical or mental disability”.
Also why would you insist that average vocabulary be changed to the exact same meaning medical vocabulary? Do you think using less understood verbiage makes it less offensive? You stated: “Replace the phrase birth defect in your vocabulary with the word congenital.” Did you know that congenital means “existing at or dating from birth”. AND congenital has NO reference to defects so in the end you would say “congenital (existing at or dating from birth) defect” instead of “birth defect”. THEN you contradict your previous encouragement by saying “But don't feel as if you need to change your everyday speech.” Do you hear yourself? That is exactly what you are suggesting.
“People who use wheelchairs say they are going for a walk, blind people say they saw that article in the paper today, And deaf people say that they heard about your new job.” I may be wrong but I have yet to hear someone in these categories claiming they do things they do not have the ability to do. Deaf people would say “found out about”, or the blind people would say “I read the article”, or those in wheelchairs would say “I am going out” or “I am going to ramble”(which means to move aimlessly from place to place, to explore idly or specify where they are going. Not referring to physically walking, but doing it for the same reason as someone going for a walk). I know people like this and they never talk as you say. Also this would not be PC if they did.
“Brain injuries” is just different wording to brain damaged, you are just rephrasing with medical usage that means exactly what the “insulting” average usage means. Why are not the medical phrases just as insulting? Oh, right because of the insult that we give words.
Impaired is not flattering? I did not know words to describe defects and disabilities were supposed to be. I mean you can’t use Traumatic Brain Injury because that is just not flattering…
Deaf just means: “lacking or deficient in the sense of hearing”, which once again is simply different wording. And you are not even accepting the PC term of hearing impaired, that is funny. Deaf and Dumb are actually terms to describe deaf mutes. It is not in fact calling them stupid, though I could understand your confusion as you seem to only understand slang. Also you just contradicted yourself again… Why can I not use Deaf in that terminology when you advised I do earlier?
Normal means average. Calling someone not normal is not an insult (unless you believe it is) it is just referring to them not being average in one way or another. Some say I am not normal and that is true. Until the majority of human kind is deaf then being deaf is not considered a normal/average trait (the being deaf and nothing else).
Why would anyone say that a person refer to all people who are not disabled “non disabled”? The only reason to do so is when it is conversationally relevant or if it is of note because the non disabled are the minority. I have never heard someone who is handicapped say “Bob over there, who is non disabled, sat on that bench over there”. Also I don’t go around even referring to the handicapped that way. Anyone who does is being narrow minded and hypocritical.
I would recommend using a dictionary before making statements about phrases and words as if you are some kind of authority because clearly you are not, as almost everything you said was contradictory, hypocritical, and lacked understanding.