<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>LAist: ESPN Hates LA Basketball</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2007/06/26/espn_hates_la_b.php</link>
<description>All comments for ESPN Hates LA Basketball</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2008 NeilA</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 15:00:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>neilthemod1@blueyonder.co.uk</managingEditor>
<webMaster>neilthemod1@blueyonder.co.uk</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>bruinryan</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2007/06/26/espn_hates_la_b.php#comment-1135911</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://laist.com/2007/06/26/espn_hates_la_b.php#comment-1135911</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 15:41:14 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;i would likewise put my money on hollinger.  but when gms overvalue picks, it&apos;s usually because they place too much weight on private workouts, physical tools, and &quot;upside&quot; while ignoring on-court results, or lackthereof (guys like brandan wright and yi jianlian in this year&apos;s draft).  what the local guys mentioned have shown is a demonstrated ability to help their teams win.  should that be the primary criteria to judge them?  of course not.  i&apos;m just saying it shouldn&apos;t just be ignored either.

if all you do is plug numbers into a spreadsheet, you&apos;re going to miss some of the nuance which drove those results.  it&apos;s better than only watching with your eyes and not using any objective analysis.  but it&apos;s not foolproof - nothing operates in a vacuum.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>guest</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2007/06/26/espn_hates_la_b.php#comment-1135757</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://laist.com/2007/06/26/espn_hates_la_b.php#comment-1135757</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 13:54:04 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;If we were to put money on who would do better this year, the actual order (the GMs) or Hollinger, my money is on Hollinger. Becoming enamored with the &quot;intangible qualities of leadership, clutch play, and heart &quot; is what leads to mistakes and poor judgement.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>bruinryan</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2007/06/26/espn_hates_la_b.php#comment-1135343</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://laist.com/2007/06/26/espn_hates_la_b.php#comment-1135343</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 08:59:07 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;i agree that objective analysis is an effective tool and that hollinger&apos;s numbers have correlated with success in the past - i said as much in the post.  but as hollinger wrote in his article, he&apos;s got his share of duds in his historical rankings as well (just not as many as the moronic nba gms) so there is no perfect system; you need to utilize both statistical analysis and scouting to most accurately evaluate players.  not saying that he&apos;s wrong in his model&apos;s assessment, just that he&apos;s not necessarily right.  only time will tell if the players in question prove him wrong.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>guest</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2007/06/26/espn_hates_la_b.php#comment-1135197</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://laist.com/2007/06/26/espn_hates_la_b.php#comment-1135197</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 06:18:13 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Except he used the formula and statistics to find out what traits in the past have led to good NBA players...they aren&apos;t numbers in a vacuum. Common Sense is often wrong - that&apos;s why there are so many draft &quot;busts&quot; and &quot;surprises&quot; - because common sense was wrong. He&apos;s trying to eliminate that. That&apos;s what statistics should be used for! To eliminate bias!

If the numbers correlate strongly with actual performance, it&apos;s something to be considered.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Militant Angeleno</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2007/06/26/espn_hates_la_b.php#comment-1135030</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://laist.com/2007/06/26/espn_hates_la_b.php#comment-1135030</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 18:08:27 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;The Eastcoast Sports Propaganda Network&apos;s hatred of Los Angeles teams is not limited to basketball. BOYCOTT ESPN!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>