Sustain LAist today!

Your monthly gift during our June member drive powers our local newsroom.
1,485 sustainers of 2,500 goal
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.

Arts & Entertainment

LA Film Fest Review: The Year After

This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.

A man sitting to my left exited the theater at about the one hour mark, never to return. Were I not obligated to give the film a fair and complete review, I might have joined him.

Rare is the movie that prompts that reaction in me (think Johnny Be Good) but The Year After was so interminably dull that I actually considered it.

The film follows 17 year-old Manu (Anaïs Demoustier) in the year following her father's death. Her life goes on--she makes a new friend, is cast in a play--but an almost permanent ennui infects her.

Unfortunately, she conveys that ennui all too well as it began to infect me after only half an hour. Demoustier has been directed to a lifeless performance, and that's a huge problem considering she's in virtually every scene of the movie.

Literally, at least 20 minutes of the film consists of her doing nothing more than staring silently and emptily into space as she wanders through her daily existence. I don't doubt that this is an accurate portrayal of what a teenage girl might go through following the death of a parent, but it isn't particularly compelling to watch.

Sponsored message

Her mother has an affair with a real estate agent, Manu falls for a teacher and engages in a furtive grope with a tennis instructor, but none of it really seems to matter. Plot elements are discarded--never to be revisited--almost as soon as they are introduced and the attention always quickly returns to Manu's dazed, vacant expression. Again, probably true to life, but, again, dull. An undercurrent of anti-consumerism also occasionally rises to the surface, but that's such a tired old trope. Didn't Fight Club have the final, best word on that over ten years ago?

Director Isabelle Czajka has crafted a film that hews too closely to stark realism to ever engage the audience on anything other than a removed, intellectual level. Her camera is purely objective, often just sitting there in long, uninterrupted masters. It focuses hard on Manu and leaves everything else in a soft blur. While many Hollywood movies may pervert the use of subjectivity and artifice, it should be remembered that these are often essential elements of good storytelling. Czajka may have delivered a relatively pure movie in that sense, but she has also delivered a boring one.

The Year After screens again on Saturday, June 23rd at 10:00 p.m. at the Landmark Theater.

_______________

The Year After
L' année suivante

France, 2006, 91 min
In French with English subtitles
North American Premiere

Directed By: Isabelle Czajka
Writer: Isabelle Czajka
Producer: Serge Duveau
Cinematographer: Denis Gaubert
Editor: Isabelle Manquillet
Music: Eric Neveux
Cast: Ariane Ascaride, Anaïs Demoustier, Patrick Catalifo, Bernard Le Coq

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today