<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>LAist: Carl&apos;s sues Jack over Angus</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2007/05/27/carls_sues_jack.php</link>
<description>All comments for Carl&apos;s sues Jack over Angus</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2008 samkim</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 14:00:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>mylilpony@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>mylilpony@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>Susan</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2007/05/27/carls_sues_jack.php#comment-1113983</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://laist.com/2007/05/27/carls_sues_jack.php#comment-1113983</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 12:31:34 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I think they&apos;re blaming Jack for their latest launch not going over, and they&apos;re simply wanting Jack to pay for more ad time.  They&apos;re desperate.  I&apos;m siding with Jack, and following that support with my wallet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>schlarb</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2007/05/27/carls_sues_jack.php#comment-1108523</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://laist.com/2007/05/27/carls_sues_jack.php#comment-1108523</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 19:28:33 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Huh. I know they&apos;re trying to save face but... I&apos;m not sure how Carl&apos;s Jr. thinks they own the idea or the trademark on Angus Beef. Not only that but Jack In The Box doesn&apos;t even mention any competing brands. 

Good luck Carl&apos;s, but if you want customers bring back those bad-ass crinkle cut fries from the early 80&apos;s. For reals.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>