<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>LAist: CD Review: Antelope&apos;s &apos;Reflector&apos;</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2007/05/20/cd_review_antel.php</link>
<description>All comments for CD Review: Antelope&apos;s &apos;Reflector&apos;</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2008 la_jessicap</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 16:00:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>jessicapauline@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>jessicapauline@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>tomdog</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2007/05/20/cd_review_antel.php#comment-1101879</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://laist.com/2007/05/20/cd_review_antel.php#comment-1101879</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 15:17:35 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;no, haven&apos;t heard Channels - would like to hear it. I&apos;m chastising Dischord because I think they can do better than they have been, I think they will shape up, it&apos;s just that stuff like Antelope is a bit disheartening. Thanks for the heads-up.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>viv</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2007/05/20/cd_review_antel.php#comment-1101876</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://laist.com/2007/05/20/cd_review_antel.php#comment-1101876</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 15:03:04 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Have you heard Channels?  J Robbins is still bringin&apos; it. (I heart him.)  But yes, new blood is good for any label.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>tomdog</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2007/05/20/cd_review_antel.php#comment-1101853</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://laist.com/2007/05/20/cd_review_antel.php#comment-1101853</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 13:21:43 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I agree with you on the Evans in terms of MacKaye as a musician, but I don&apos;t think he&apos;s brought that attitude to the label. Also, to be fair, he&apos;s not the only entity in control at the label, it&apos;s not like Dischord=MacKaye. I think putting Antelope out there is a poor decision based on a scene that you call &quot;incestuous,&quot; and in the sentence following the one where you claim the catalog is diverse, you say the label&apos;s &quot;past major players....have remarkably different sounds&quot; - the key word to emphasize is &quot;past&quot;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>viv</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2007/05/20/cd_review_antel.php#comment-1101846</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://laist.com/2007/05/20/cd_review_antel.php#comment-1101846</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 12:53:09 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I don&apos;t know, I think Dischord has now (and has always had) a fairly diverse catalog.  Even the label&apos;s past major players - Jawbox, Nation of Ulysses (and later the Make-Up), Fugazi - all have remarkably different sounds.  And yes, the member lineups can be a tad incestuous, but I wouldn&apos;t say the culture is absolutely inbred. Have a listen to the past few Evens records.  They&apos;re really a testament to MacKaye&apos;s ability to successfully switch gears.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>