<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>LAist: Good Neighbor Laws</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2007/05/19/good_neighbor_l.php</link>
<description>All comments for Good Neighbor Laws</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2008 samkim</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 14:00:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>mylilpony@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>mylilpony@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>Adam Rose</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2007/05/19/good_neighbor_l.php#comment-1101630</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://laist.com/2007/05/19/good_neighbor_l.php#comment-1101630</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 15:51:41 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Doesn&apos;t &quot;no construction on Sundays&quot; sound similar to so-called Blue Laws that prohibit alcohol sales on Sunday? Some have argued that Blue Laws are antisemitic, or more precisely discriminatory against any religion that does not take Sunday as a holy day. It doubles the number of days that a religious person cannot work if their faith does not follow the Christian week, and that can be particularly disastrous to somebody who owns a small business or is the sole source of income for a family. The traditional example has been a Jewish liquor store owner (I know, I know) but this law brings up a much more compelling example ...

If you&apos;re Christian, you believe that Jesus was a Jewish carpenter. If he lived in LA, this law would put him at a competitive disadvantage against non-Jewish carpenters. It&apos;s a law against Jesus! Does that make the law unchristian?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>