LAist: Spiderman 3 Blows

J. boogeyman

Fri, 11 May 2007 08:15:56 -0800

1. Spiderman cried at least 5 times on command. The man is a superhero who carries the weight of the world on his shoulders. It should take more than 3 seconds to make him cry like a bitch when things aren't going his way. This never fucking happened in the comic and sorry to sound like a fanboy but this was miles from his character. Yeah, it did happen in the comics, I had a crap load of spidey comics, before we got robbed. BIG spider-man fan, KNOW YOUR CRAP, before talking it! J. boogeyman

kal

Fri, 11 May 2007 06:40:36 -0800

Thank you Mike, at least some people know what their talking about Henry.

kal

Fri, 11 May 2007 06:33:10 -0800

Thank you Mike, at least some people know what their talking about!

Marco

Thu, 10 May 2007 14:48:06 -0800

In all of the Spider-man movies the villain had a plan and Spider-man got in the way,but Venom's plan was to kill Spider-man. Venom would not run away from a fight to the death. If they put him in the next movie it wouldn't last long Venom has a big weakness and for Spider-man not to use it for his advantage is stupid. If Harry died still hating Spider-man is kind of sad and those who do not know the comics would not like that. Also what makes a bad movie is a bad ending. This movie had an awkward middle and a great ending. The order,from least to greatest, is: Spider-man Spider-man 2 Spider-man 3

Taran

Thu, 10 May 2007 14:43:31 -0800

First off, I thought the movie was pretty good, and of coarse he acted a bit emo, it was the fucking suit messing with his emotions, like he could fucking control it... One flaw i could see was of coarse how they fit that many villians and didnt give the basis around them... and there was alot of feelings in that movie, i guess people who dont like spiderman, shouldnt of watched it, because its what i exspected coming from the first and second one to lead up to..

Mike

Thu, 10 May 2007 14:43:18 -0800

Henry...that is entirely retarded. Sin City and 300 (which wasn't an original idea in the first place) so closely follow the comics because FRANK MILLER WORKED ON THEM! The X-Men, Superman, and Batman series BOTH took several liberties in their first movies. I'm not sure where you got the idea that they were extremely faithful to the "original" stories, but they're not. Wolverine wasn't even a fucking original X-Men character moron. Important characters are rolled up into one character, relationships are changed, etc. Movie-makers do what they think will draw more than just the average fan into the theater. A comic book movie will NEVER be very faithful to the comic, because there's too much development that occurs in most comic series that have been running since the FREAKING '60 or '70s to stay very faithful. Get the fuck over it dude. That might've been the most idiotic statement ON this site. Or at least close to the statement that Spiderman 3 sucked because the characters developed more than "Mr. Negative" was able to comprehend. I'm sorry the movie wasn't serious enough for you, it always sucks when there're things that make you laugh in a movie...

ed

Thu, 10 May 2007 12:45:35 -0800

who ever thought this movie sucked is gay

Henry D

Thu, 10 May 2007 09:39:27 -0800

or wait I'm thinking of Alistaire Smyth...

Henry D

Thu, 10 May 2007 09:36:33 -0800

"they are not trying to base the movie on the comics anyways" So are they trying to base the movie on the true life story of Peter Parker of New York, NY? "And tell me a comic book movie that is based off of the comics?? NONE!!!!" Sigh. Sin City, 300, Batman Begins, X-Men, X-2, Superman. These were all excellent comic book to movie adaptations, and with the exception of the X-Men series they all stayed very faithful to the original stories. "And Harry did die in the comics dumbass." Yes but I believe it was much, much later, and he died slowly because of poisoning from the Green Goblin powers. Ass. In splinter stories, he became paralyzed during an altercation with Spider-man and thus hated him even more (the television show).

kal

Thu, 10 May 2007 06:51:22 -0800

can you please shut the hell up! You don't know a good movie when you see one. I really liked the movie, but i didn't like how Venom was in it for like 20 minutes, but it was still good, plus they are not trying to base the movie on the comics anyways. Everyone cries dumbass. And tell me a comic book movie that is based off of the comics?? NONE!!!! And Harry did die in the comics dumbass.

PB

Thu, 10 May 2007 01:45:46 -0800

I agree Spiderman sucked! Bruce Campbell was the highlight. I can't believe you liked the Rush Hour trailer, that movie looked absolutely horrible!! BAAAAAAAAA!!

fakey Fakerson

Thu, 10 May 2007 00:13:15 -0800

FUck you Twit. You dont know shit. loser.

adele

Wed, 09 May 2007 22:51:36 -0800

I like a bitchy review just as much as the next person, but your writing sucks shit.

Short Attention Sp

Wed, 09 May 2007 21:47:06 -0800

Never mind the eyeliner - was Sandman wearing lipstick in that last scene?!

MARRY JANE

Wed, 09 May 2007 21:18:47 -0800

bla333 triple bla333 hidup bla333

oliver

Wed, 09 May 2007 19:36:03 -0800

Dude—it's spelled Spider-Man.

xtx

Wed, 09 May 2007 19:15:29 -0800

I haven't seen S3 yet, but I think I have to agree with Mr. Negative. He sounds like a guy who liked Grindhouse like I did

harleene

Wed, 09 May 2007 16:59:47 -0800

wow! too bad it actually was bad, and most reviews seem to stem from opinions anyway. i loved the spiderman movies, i was even an extra for the first one! but holy shit did this one suck. and using the phrase, yeah sure it was "awkward and weird" at times, is just further proof that the movie sucked big time. unless you watched the movie with these scenes cut out then fine, you might have something sort of decent. but as a package, in its entirety, as any movie should be reviewed, it was definitely a load of crap. hey, i looove sam raimi, i even love kiki dunst, but man, nothing could save this movie. and you know what was the worst? that fucking emo hipster hair swish whatever you want to call it, tobey does. and was that fucking eyeliner?!?!?!? come on!

Adam Smith

Wed, 09 May 2007 16:36:09 -0800

I saw Spiderman 3 a few days ago and thought it was good. Sure it had a few scenes that were a little awkward and wierd at times, but that doesn't mean it went down a shithole! I've read countless reviews by people like you who love to criticize this movie. Tell me then, what movie do you like, why don't you give an example of something far better and back that up with actual reasoning instead of opinion! You seem to be an amateur at reviewing movies. Stop crying about how bad it was! No one wants to hear your bullshit! mother FUCKER!

sam

Wed, 09 May 2007 15:56:37 -0800

they should have kept venom out of spiderman 3 as they had planned it...used it for four, allow for the characters to develop instead o fintroducing them and then throwing them in for 5 minutes stupid whores for money at the studios who want money now and spend 250 million dollars on a movie for CG and can't spend 1% of that on scripts...