<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>LAist: Who Really Runs L.A.? Nobody&apos;s quite sure...</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2007/04/11/who_really_runs_la_nobodys_quite_sure.php</link>
<description>All comments for Who Really Runs L.A.? Nobody&apos;s quite sure...</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2008 la_julie</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 13:00:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>juliewolfson@ca.rr.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>juliewolfson@ca.rr.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>LA City Nerd</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2007/04/11/who_really_runs_la_nobodys_quite_sure.php#comment-1067683</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://laist.com/2007/04/11/who_really_runs_la_nobodys_quite_sure.php#comment-1067683</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2007 23:04:12 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;My take was that those who have a constituency that can be mobilized have the power. I wouldn&apos;t be surprised if LAist has the ability to help &quot;run&quot; LA. (There is definitely a constituency connected with this blog.)

Also, not mentioned but good to remember: in this City, it&apos;s fairly obvious that power is never bestowed - it&apos;s always taken. So, those who want to run the City need to stand up and take it. It&apos;s there... waiting... for someone... anyone...?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>