Sustain LAist today!

Your monthly gift during our June member drive powers our local newsroom.
1,485 sustainers of 2,500 goal
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.

News

Who Really Runs L.A.? Nobody's quite sure...

This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.

Last night, Zócalo L.A. hosted a panel discussion at the Central Library to explore the question, “Who Really Runs L.A.?” The discussion, moderated by Mariel Garza of the Los Angeles Daily News, featured panelists Kerman Maddox, who works for public affairs consulting firm Dakota Communications; L.A. Weekly city hall reporter David Zahniser; political scientist and Director of Pat Brown Institute of Public Affairs at Cal State L.A. Jaime Regalado; and Los Angeles Magazine writer Jesse Katz.

The enigmatic (and possibly, pointless) question was debated for about an hour, launched by Zahniser’s comedic diatribe about who doesn’t run L.A., ultimately settling on immigrants as the real steam of the city engine. “Immigrants run Los Angeles, just not in the way we think they run Los Angeles,” said Zahniser. “It’s more like an object in motion stays in motion, and the people keeping the city in motion are immigrants.”

The primary difficulty underlying the panel’s discussion was the inability to define the nebulous concept that is “power.” Garza loosely suggested that power might be measured by one’s ability to get higher-ups to answer phone calls. Katz, echoing themes expressed in Los Angeles Magazine’s December 2006 list of the 100 most influential people in L.A., recommended going beyond “traditional notions of the business elite, the civic elite, the political elite.” To demonstrate that point, he offered up some more scrappy power folk such as Mark Lisanti of Defamer.

The most interesting part of the discussion came when Maddox suggested Maria Elena Durazo of the L.A. County Federation of Labor and Regalado followed with labor giant Tyrone Freeman, sparking a discussion about the potency of labor today. Maddox stressed the power of labor and its relationship to issues "important with the regular people" such as jobs, wages, education and health care, but Zahniser rather deftly deflated the suggestion by adding, "I've had a hard time sensing where labor has made real strides in the city in the last two years."

Ultimately, panelists bandied about an assortment of potential local power brokers, including gang-battler Connie Rice; L.A. City Planning Department's Jane Blumenfeld, who passed a pivotal rezoning law easing the path for mixed-use projects; an assortment of philanthropists; church leaders; Ruben Castro, the head of the Mexican mafia; and even a denim model whose derrière has been the "face" of the denim advertising industry.

Zahniser probably summed it up best by acknowledging the preposterousness of the question itself. "Power is everywhere and nowhere. ... Is there ever going to be a center again of civic conversation?"

Sponsored message

Zócalo has two more upcoming panel discussions: "Can Progressives Save Iraq?" on April 18 and "Is California Ready for Its Close-up?" on April 19. For more information, visit Zocalo.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today