http://laist.com/2007/03/05/times_they_are_ashrinking.php All comments for Times, They Are a-Shrinking en-us 2008 la_zach Sun, 22 Jun 2008 12:37:50 -0800 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss tincanorange@gmail.com tincanorange@gmail.com 60 http://laist.com/2007/03/05/times_they_are_ashrinking.php#comment-1027161 http://laist.com/2007/03/05/times_they_are_ashrinking.php#comment-1027161 Comments Tue, 06 Mar 2007 16:08:29 -0800 <p>Dammit, they got rid of Candorville!</p> http://laist.com/2007/03/05/times_they_are_ashrinking.php#comment-1026750 http://laist.com/2007/03/05/times_they_are_ashrinking.php#comment-1026750 Comments Tue, 06 Mar 2007 08:36:52 -0800 <p>oops! i think it was andy that fixed it up all nice and pretty. (thanks andy!) Also makes me wonder what other sections from the Times do we miss and wish were brought back?</p> http://laist.com/2007/03/05/times_they_are_ashrinking.php#comment-1026729 http://laist.com/2007/03/05/times_they_are_ashrinking.php#comment-1026729 Comments Tue, 06 Mar 2007 08:17:40 -0800 <p>Ah, the Outdoors section. Almost a relic at this point, but such a good one. You are right. (ps - thanks for fixing my italics!)</p> http://laist.com/2007/03/05/times_they_are_ashrinking.php#comment-1026530 http://laist.com/2007/03/05/times_they_are_ashrinking.php#comment-1026530 Comments Mon, 05 Mar 2007 18:42:54 -0800 <p>Great post. Book review section aside, the LA Times can never effectively serve its readership (in this so-called Southland [their word] and it's 300+ days of sunshine and warmth) until it brings back the weekly Outdoors section. For shame, wicked witch of Spring Street!</p>