http://laist.com/2007/02/13/los_angeles_version_20.php All comments for "Los Angeles Version 2.0" en-us 2008 lindsayrebecca Sun, 22 Jun 2008 12:15:40 -0800 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss lindsay@laist.com lindsay@laist.com 60 http://laist.com/2007/02/13/los_angeles_version_20.php#comment-1012823 http://laist.com/2007/02/13/los_angeles_version_20.php#comment-1012823 Comments Tue, 13 Feb 2007 22:03:51 -0800 <p>Won't Comcast/TimeWarner file a lawsuit against this proposal claiming it's "government infringement on commercial trade"? And on top of that, they have contracts with California giving them sole fiber optic rights within certain areas of Southern California, namely, most of Los Angeles. How's Villaraigosa gonna spar with that?</p> http://laist.com/2007/02/13/los_angeles_version_20.php#comment-1012749 http://laist.com/2007/02/13/los_angeles_version_20.php#comment-1012749 Comments Tue, 13 Feb 2007 17:35:38 -0800 <p>I know the mistake is Janelle Erikson's, not yours, but it's worth pointing out that "WiFi" is not short for "wireless fidelity," a phrase that doesn't actually mean anything anyway.</p>