<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>LAist: Could Gwen Stefani and/or No Doubt play Coachella?</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2007/01/10/could_gwen_stefani_andor_no_doubt_play_coachella.php</link>
<description>All comments for Could Gwen Stefani and/or No Doubt play Coachella?</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2008 lindsayrebecca</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 11:00:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>lindsay@laist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>lindsay@laist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>dave</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2007/01/10/could_gwen_stefani_andor_no_doubt_play_coachella.php#comment-929323</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://laist.com/2007/01/10/could_gwen_stefani_andor_no_doubt_play_coachella.php#comment-929323</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 19:33:26 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot; gwen is just a current popular pop singer.&quot;
well she has been around for about 20 years now, and I think it has been 12 years since she hit #1. Was Maddonna  &quot; just a current popular pop singer&quot; 10 years ago?
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Figgins</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2007/01/10/could_gwen_stefani_andor_no_doubt_play_coachella.php#comment-927689</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://laist.com/2007/01/10/could_gwen_stefani_andor_no_doubt_play_coachella.php#comment-927689</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 16:07:35 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Young mother? Puhlease. Shes pushing 40!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>anon</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2007/01/10/could_gwen_stefani_andor_no_doubt_play_coachella.php#comment-924260</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://laist.com/2007/01/10/could_gwen_stefani_andor_no_doubt_play_coachella.php#comment-924260</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 08:17:22 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;madonna is an icon, gwen is just a current popular pop singer.  i highly doubt she would be booked at coachella.  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>tony</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2007/01/10/could_gwen_stefani_andor_no_doubt_play_coachella.php#comment-917907</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://laist.com/2007/01/10/could_gwen_stefani_andor_no_doubt_play_coachella.php#comment-917907</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 20:24:54 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;care to show us some proof of that anon?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>anon</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2007/01/10/could_gwen_stefani_andor_no_doubt_play_coachella.php#comment-917587</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://laist.com/2007/01/10/could_gwen_stefani_andor_no_doubt_play_coachella.php#comment-917587</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 19:44:49 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;actually you&apos;re wrong, she is playing gibson amph in LA on April 27th, it just isnt on the official website.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Eric</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2007/01/10/could_gwen_stefani_andor_no_doubt_play_coachella.php#comment-916780</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://laist.com/2007/01/10/could_gwen_stefani_andor_no_doubt_play_coachella.php#comment-916780</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:47:07 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;This articl e is incorrect - Madonna was horrible and let down many people for the following reasons:
1. Showtime - She came on 30 minutes after her show was to start
2. Set - She did Hung, Ray of Light and then 2 (MAYBE 3) songs of no value to motivating a crowd in the DANCE tent.
3. Exeunt - As stated in number two she did a tiny set, and also left the stage with 20 minutes left on her performance schedule.
4. Time waster/Cow Traffic - The whole festival (~75-80k each day) crowded over to the dance tent corner to only have their time wasted.

But thats Madonna.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>