<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>LAist: Is Michael Richards a Jew or Not?</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2006/11/23/is_michael_richards_a_jew_or_not.php</link>
<description>All comments for Is Michael Richards a Jew or Not?</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2008 samkim</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 14:00:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>mylilpony@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>mylilpony@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>John McNally</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2006/11/23/is_michael_richards_a_jew_or_not.php#comment-850741</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://laist.com/2006/11/23/is_michael_richards_a_jew_or_not.php#comment-850741</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 24 Dec 2006 16:58:13 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;WHEW! Micheal Richards a jew? Now there&apos;s a corruption of knowledge. That a Jew is not a racist. It&apos;s only fitting that if Richards is a jew he not has a propensity to be a anti-black but also has a propensity to be a zionist. Has the author taken notice to the zionist aparthied taking place in Palestine by the Jews? jews are the biggest murdering racist&apos;s going. I hope Richards is not a Jew. We don&apos;t need another one.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Scott Mercer</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2006/11/23/is_michael_richards_a_jew_or_not.php#comment-736583</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://laist.com/2006/11/23/is_michael_richards_a_jew_or_not.php#comment-736583</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2006 13:13:39 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;It seems like The Jewish Journal, a free publication, did no research on this matter other than quoting Wikipedia, a web-based encyclopedia that anyone change at a whim.

So, I have outed Jewish Journal as a free publication, and Wikipedia as an open-source website.  Does this mean that Jewish Journal, or Wikipedia, are necessarily incorrect?  No, it does not.  They may very well be incorrect.  In fact, I believe that in general Wikipedia is, generally speaking, reliable, due to its peer review process.

However, nor does this mean that Wikipedia, and by extension, Jewish Journal, are necessarily more reliable and truthful than some PR dude.  Just making the point that Wikipedia should be taken with a grain of salt.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>tony</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2006/11/23/is_michael_richards_a_jew_or_not.php#comment-727375</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://laist.com/2006/11/23/is_michael_richards_a_jew_or_not.php#comment-727375</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 18:35:31 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;So you&apos;re saying that you&apos;re taking the word of a newly hired PR-man over the Jewish Journal?

Call us cynical, and as much as we like our friends in the PR biz, if the Jewish Journal says that Richards isn&apos;t Jewish, we&apos;re going to stick with their expertise.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Gedaliah</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2006/11/23/is_michael_richards_a_jew_or_not.php#comment-727322</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://laist.com/2006/11/23/is_michael_richards_a_jew_or_not.php#comment-727322</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 18:21:51 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;
Regardless what religion Michael Richards&apos; &apos;practices&apos;, if his mother was born a Jew according to Halacha (Jewish Law), them Michael Richards is Jewish.  Even if his mother didn&apos;t practice Judaism, if her mother (Richards&apos; grandmother) was Jewish according to Jewish law, his grandmother is Jewish, therefore Richards&apos; mother is Jewish, so therefore Michael Richards is Jewish.  Jewish identity is passed along maternally.  Assuming Mr. Rubenstein is Jewish, I seriously doubt that he would be say Richards is Jewish if he were not.  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>