<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>LAist: Was Bush Honest about 9/11? Loose Change Screens Tonight</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2006/10/16/was_bush_honest_about_911_loose_change_screens_tonight.php</link>
<description>All comments for Was Bush Honest about 9/11? Loose Change Screens Tonight</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2008 Donna Lethal</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 10:00:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>donnalethal@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>donnalethal@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>Frogmeat.com</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2006/10/16/was_bush_honest_about_911_loose_change_screens_tonight.php#comment-474261</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://laist.com/2006/10/16/was_bush_honest_about_911_loose_change_screens_tonight.php#comment-474261</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 14:35:49 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;The implosion world article is a joke.  It&apos;s conclusions are logically invalid &quot;since 10 story buildings are demolished from the bottom up the 110 story towers could not have been demolished since they were destroyed from the top town&quot; or ignore important evidence such as the chemical signature of the explosive thermate being found in the debris.

Despite this they still have to admit that the fall of building 7 was probably a demolition.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>ben bang</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2006/10/16/was_bush_honest_about_911_loose_change_screens_tonight.php#comment-468860</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://laist.com/2006/10/16/was_bush_honest_about_911_loose_change_screens_tonight.php#comment-468860</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 02:06:47 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;That&apos;s funny.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Farnsworth</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2006/10/16/was_bush_honest_about_911_loose_change_screens_tonight.php#comment-467345</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://laist.com/2006/10/16/was_bush_honest_about_911_loose_change_screens_tonight.php#comment-467345</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 19:42:50 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Close... SO close... but NOT quite there.  Have a look at this...

http://newtruth911.blogspot.com/&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>ben bang</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2006/10/16/was_bush_honest_about_911_loose_change_screens_tonight.php#comment-465664</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://laist.com/2006/10/16/was_bush_honest_about_911_loose_change_screens_tonight.php#comment-465664</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 13:29:50 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;There are several strawmen out there in the 9/11 conspiracy universe... that whole controlled demolition theory being chief among them.  Others include the &quot;drone&quot; thoeries and the theory that no plane hit the pentagon.

Are they there to discredit sceptics?  Becuase there are many, many legitimate skepticisms out there with regards to 9/11 that have gone wholly unanswered.  

Taken along with the great lenghts that have been undertaken to insure that those questions never get answered, it stinks enough to warrant a true investigation.

That will never happen.  But never forget just WHO benefitted from 9/11 the most.  Personally, I think the government wasn&apos;t directly complicit in the attacks.  But it goes higher than we think... perhaps the Saudi government.  And Bush probably knew and LET it go down.  

Then he raped the benefits.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>A. Nonny Mouse</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2006/10/16/was_bush_honest_about_911_loose_change_screens_tonight.php#comment-464804</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://laist.com/2006/10/16/was_bush_honest_about_911_loose_change_screens_tonight.php#comment-464804</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 10:51:08 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Over at Implosion World, a web site for explosive demolition professionals, they&apos;ve put together an expert analysis of the WTC collapse that examines the claims made by Loose Change and other sources.

If you&apos;re going to go see Loose Change, you might want to check out the Implosion World paper first, so you have some idea what people who actually know something about controlled explosive demolition have to say.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>