-thumb-110x110-455795.jpg)
Build Your Own BBQ for Under 10 Bucks!
Video: Police Detain Blogger in Subway Station for Taking Photos
Stadium to the Sea: LA Marathon Releases 2010 Course Map
A Buttermilk Truck Sneak Peek: Red Velvet Pancakes, Hawaiian Bread French Toast & More...
SuperClásico Playoff Series Finale Is Serious Business
This administration has seen its highs and lows. It was wrong about Saddam having WMDs, it can't seem to find Bin Laden, billions of dollars are unaccounted for in Iraq, some of our military have been accused of torturing prisoners, the CIA was found to have secret prisons, the President continues to want to spy on US phone calls without a warrant, the Vice President's office was caught revealing the name of a covert CIA official to get back at her husband who wrote an newspaper column, both the majority leaders in the house and the senate were involved in scandals, the White House was exposed for letting a gay male hooker enter the White House Press Conferences every day for over a year on a Day Pass, this administration has been caught paying off reporters at home and abroad, Condi Rice seems to be caught in a lie about being briefed about 9/11 by the former administration... the list goes on and on.
So do you trust this administration when it comes to 9/11? The controversial documentary "Loose Change" seems to have some wild accusations that might be unfounded, but what about the ones that they're correct about?
If you believe this administration or not, tonight you will have a chance to view the doc in its entirety and talk about it with your westside neighbors: UnUrban Coffee House, 3310 Pico Blvd., Santa Monica 8pm
add to stumble upon
add to reddit
tweet this
post to facebook
Over at Implosion World, a web site for explosive demolition professionals, they've put together an expert analysis of the WTC collapse that examines the claims made by Loose Change and other sources.
If you're going to go see Loose Change, you might want to check out the Implosion World paper first, so you have some idea what people who actually know something about controlled explosive demolition have to say.
There are several strawmen out there in the 9/11 conspiracy universe... that whole controlled demolition theory being chief among them. Others include the "drone" thoeries and the theory that no plane hit the pentagon.
Are they there to discredit sceptics? Becuase there are many, many legitimate skepticisms out there with regards to 9/11 that have gone wholly unanswered.
Taken along with the great lenghts that have been undertaken to insure that those questions never get answered, it stinks enough to warrant a true investigation.
That will never happen. But never forget just WHO benefitted from 9/11 the most. Personally, I think the government wasn't directly complicit in the attacks. But it goes higher than we think... perhaps the Saudi government. And Bush probably knew and LET it go down.
Then he raped the benefits.
Close... SO close... but NOT quite there. Have a look at this...
http://newtruth911.blogspot.com/
That's funny.
The implosion world article is a joke. It's conclusions are logically invalid "since 10 story buildings are demolished from the bottom up the 110 story towers could not have been demolished since they were destroyed from the top town" or ignore important evidence such as the chemical signature of the explosive thermate being found in the debris.
Despite this they still have to admit that the fall of building 7 was probably a demolition.