<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>LAist: Verizon&apos;s Unlimited EVDO Wireless Ain&apos;t So Unlimited</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2006/07/26/verizons_unlimited_evdo_wireless_aint_so_unlimited.php</link>
<description>All comments for Verizon&apos;s Unlimited EVDO Wireless Ain&apos;t So Unlimited</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2008 la_zach</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 23:07:29 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>tincanorange@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>tincanorange@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>dinodinco</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2006/07/26/verizons_unlimited_evdo_wireless_aint_so_unlimited.php#comment-280056</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://laist.com/2006/07/26/verizons_unlimited_evdo_wireless_aint_so_unlimited.php#comment-280056</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2006 09:51:00 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Sounds similiar to the class action lawsuit against Verizon when they advertised their Motorola v710 mobile phone as a &quot;Bluetooth&quot; phone.  Many customers (like myself) purchased the phone unknowing that Verizon intentionally crippled the phone so that it was only &quot;Bluetooth&quot; compatible with a headset, however not with your computer.  Verizon recently lost the class action suit on the grounds of false advertising.  Furthermore, Verizon are notorious nickle-and-dimers and this definitely sounds like a pattern.  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Peggy Archer</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2006/07/26/verizons_unlimited_evdo_wireless_aint_so_unlimited.php#comment-279686</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://laist.com/2006/07/26/verizons_unlimited_evdo_wireless_aint_so_unlimited.php#comment-279686</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 21:27:03 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Well, it&apos;s been well established that Verizon are, in fact, evil pig-fuckers so this doesn&apos;t surprise me. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>jayfader</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2006/07/26/verizons_unlimited_evdo_wireless_aint_so_unlimited.php#comment-279682</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://laist.com/2006/07/26/verizons_unlimited_evdo_wireless_aint_so_unlimited.php#comment-279682</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 21:02:29 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;You are not alone!

http://techdirt.com/articles/20060726/1926251.shtml&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Jumpcut</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2006/07/26/verizons_unlimited_evdo_wireless_aint_so_unlimited.php#comment-279650</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://laist.com/2006/07/26/verizons_unlimited_evdo_wireless_aint_so_unlimited.php#comment-279650</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 19:48:57 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Forget Verizon.  Sprint&apos;s EVDO access is faster, cheaper and truly unlimited.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Kate</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2006/07/26/verizons_unlimited_evdo_wireless_aint_so_unlimited.php#comment-279585</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://laist.com/2006/07/26/verizons_unlimited_evdo_wireless_aint_so_unlimited.php#comment-279585</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 17:30:52 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I (heart) my Verizon EVDO modem, but alas, I do have my occassional gripes with its spotty connections and less-than-stellar speed.  I suppose it&apos;s not much better than cell phone coverage.

That photo is hilarious.  I wonder if the Dalai Lama uses Instant Messenger. :)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>