<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>LAist: Citysearch Responds + The Funniest Rejected Reviews</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2006/07/18/citysearch_responds_the_funniest_rejected_reviews.php</link>
<description>All comments for Citysearch Responds + The Funniest Rejected Reviews</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2008 samkim</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 14:00:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>mylilpony@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>mylilpony@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>Sarah</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2006/07/18/citysearch_responds_the_funniest_rejected_reviews.php#comment-277444</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://laist.com/2006/07/18/citysearch_responds_the_funniest_rejected_reviews.php#comment-277444</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jul 2006 12:47:20 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;One of my reviews was pulled.  I wrote citysearch an email asking why.  I said I wanted to know so that I could comply with their standards and repost a review.  I got an automatic reply email saying I would get a response within 3-5 days.  I never heard from Citysearch again.  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Yo</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2006/07/18/citysearch_responds_the_funniest_rejected_reviews.php#comment-273855</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://laist.com/2006/07/18/citysearch_responds_the_funniest_rejected_reviews.php#comment-273855</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 16:51:29 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;So, why was the review from original story pulled?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>