Deja vu all over again . . .

worlds.jpg

First, we are not accusing anyone of anything. It would really be hard to believe. Please, we are just a little website with some moxy and often clever writing and insight. The Los Angeles Times has hundreds of reporters, many devoted to entertainment. Maybe it’s just that the problem is out there so everyone is getting into the act and taking notice. After all, this is Los Angeles. And Los Angeles is a company town, like it or not.

What are we talking about? A story in the paper today which talks about the slump in box office for films in the USA and worldwide. The article blames the slump, in large part, on the poor quality product coming out of Hollywood. Too many sequels and other junk. Sounds familiar. Are we the first to say that most Hollywood films are not very good, especially lately? No. Have we been saying it recently and quite a bit? Yep. Does that mean the LA Times is reading LAist? Who knows?

Let's just say that the Los Angeles Times is a great paper and cares about a business which employs thousands of people here in LA. We care about the business too. We want to see it succeed because many of our friends and family make their livings in it, put food on the table because of it and have a great time while doing it.

Let's all push harder for theater owners to keep people from talking on cell phones during movies and for ticket prices to drop a little. Let's ask that something be done about otherwise nice people who for some reason think that bringing a baby to an R-Rated horror film on a Friday night is a good idea and then wonder why the kid is crying. And, let's ask for the people that have to have the movie explained to them, loudly, during the show, to just stay home and watch TV where they can talk all they want.

But most of all, let's push for some better movies. Maybe Hollywood could try thinking less in terms of how to sell a movie but instead, try to think about how to make a movie. And make it better. That way, they might find the slup over and people returning to their seats. We think the Los Angeles Times would agree.

Email This Entry


Comments (2) [rss]

For me, this was a classic LAT 'buried lede'. The real story is that gross revenues A. are noe 50-60% from outside the US and B. were up 47% last year, the biggest rise in history.

So, after the biggest rise in history (which itself has much to do with higher ticket prices), why would you expect a similar rise this year?

The summer product has been equally bad each of the past few years, in my opinion, but last year was a monster year because of 2 films. I don't think this slump is real... in fact I am more and more convinced that no one really knows what the true economics of Hollywood's theatrical releases are.

Yeah I have been working on a site called E-Audience.com for most of the last fiscal year. It is kind of a "kill it before it grows" avenue for the public to critique Hollywood films-in-development before they are actually produced.

Admittedly, I am the one doing the commenting and all of the posts are on films which, to me, just don't appear to "add-up" business-wise in terms of their audience appeal. But, I'd like to include positive and negative films-in-development selections and do it as a site, rather than as a blog.

If anybody is interested in partnering and developing E-Audience with me (and maybe making or saving Hollywood some money), give me a write at "chris at chrisfranklin dotcom."

Post a comment (Comment Policy)

Tips

About LAist

LAist is a website about Los Angeles. More

Editor: Zach Behrens Co-Editor: Lindsay William-Ross Publisher: Gothamist

Contribute

Latest Tip:

Begley is a raving nutball and he is dead wrong. StrokerMcgurk
[more]

Latest Photo:

Subscribe

Use an RSS reader to stay up to date with the latest news and posts from LAist.

All Our RSS

Links