<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>LAist: LAist Watches:  Hitchhiker&apos;s Guide</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2005/04/29/laist_watches_hitchhikers_guide.php</link>
<description>All comments for LAist Watches:  Hitchhiker&apos;s Guide</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2008 lindsayrebecca</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 09:30:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>lindsay@laist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>lindsay@laist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>Amanda</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2005/04/29/laist_watches_hitchhikers_guide.php#comment-145223</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://laist.com/2005/04/29/laist_watches_hitchhikers_guide.php#comment-145223</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2005 15:21:11 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Well, I&apos;d have to heartily disagree with you assessment.  I thoroughly enjoyed the film, despite having no previous knowledge of the Hitchhiker books or Douglas Adams.  I had been under the impression that Douglas Adams was one of those nouveau hippie writers like Tom Robbins, and I had avoided his books, or knowing anything about him, even though my boyfriend is a huge fan.  I thought that the film was very accessible to Douglas Adams virgins—unlike all the Harry Potter movies, which make fun of you if you don’t know the difference between a hogwarth and a moggle. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Will Campbell</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2005/04/29/laist_watches_hitchhikers_guide.php#comment-145219</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://laist.com/2005/04/29/laist_watches_hitchhikers_guide.php#comment-145219</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2005 19:50:22 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;But what if you&apos;re a fan of Adams AND got angry watching &quot;Mulholland Drive?&quot;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>